Osnat 
Ifs 
I am glad observe eHarmony answering within recognized web log to an article entitled "Marriage-Maker Claims Are Tied in Knots " from Wall Street diary. The WSJ post examines many matrimony statistics released by online dating bdsm chat sites like eHarmony as well as the strategy accustomed calculate this type of statistics. We talked quite about that topic and, a couple of weeks ago if the original WSJ post was published (see tale).
The WSJ post failed to look to kindly regarding stats released by dating sites, and for the most part I agree with the author. The public does need to understand exactly how these research tend to be created. Of the many online dating sites pointed out in the WSJ article, "eHarmony shines as on the list of a lot more careful ones". This is simply not just a glowing document for eHarmony thus, they chose to post a reply on their web log.
When you look at the eHarmony blog post they're going into additional details on how they calculated that their particular dating internet site had been accountable for 2percent of marriages in america, through the 12-month period stopping March 2007. Almost all of the information we currently understood about from a previously revealed PDF file entitled "eHarmony | Harris Interactive 2007 wedding Metrics range eHarmony Marriages" (see tale), nevertheless the article does remove some more details. Exactly what this website article does program is actually, eHarmony is trying becoming as open and clear with the analysis results possible. I believe title "start correspondence" may indeed be a good choice when it comes down to recognized eHarmony weblog.
Here's the full eHarmony reaction to the Wall Street diary about how exactly they calculate their own matrimony data. For additional details about this dating internet site, browse all of our writeup on eHarmony.